What Has AI Search Ready Implemented and Verified?
Direct answer
These case studies document the problem, work completed, evidence checked, and limitations of each project. We publish implementation claims only when we can verify the work, and performance claims only when dated measurement supports them.
Building Teeth by Trev for AI Search
A WordPress, technical SEO, entity and enquiry-flow foundation for a multi-city cosmetic and implant dentistry brand.
Evidence status: build and staging QA verified; traffic, ranking and AI-citation claims reserved until a full measurement window.
Original research pilotOntario AI Search Visibility Index Pilot: September 2026
A dated comparison of Google AI Mode, Gemini, and Perplexity recommendations across three Ontario service categories and three cities, with exact prompts, source patterns, and honest limitations.
Evidence status: pilot verified; 14.3% cross-platform consensus, not a market-share claim.
Client case studyGTA Realtor Website Organization for Local SEO and AI Search
Client-approved work completed for Asad Sohail in August 2026, with direct-work confirmation, public feedback, dated website captures, and a clear boundary around unmeasured outcomes.
Evidence status: implementation and client feedback verified; analytics results not yet supplied.
Internal case studyHow AI Search Ready Built Its Own SEO and AEO Foundation
A transparent account of the Astro website work: crawler access, canonical and sitemap controls, structured data, entity consistency, answer-first content, local signals, and automated QA.
Evidence status: technical implementation verified; long-term visibility results still being measured.
Internal benchmarkAI Answer Visibility Baseline: September 2026
A dated Google AI Mode benchmark using 11 non-branded questions and one branded control, with exact prompts, observed competitors, limitations, and the actions scheduled for re-testing.
Evidence status: baseline verified; no improvement claim is made.
What Makes a Case Study Trustworthy?
- The business, starting condition, scope, and dates are clearly identified.
- Implemented changes are separated from traffic, ranking, lead, or AI-mention outcomes.
- Metrics include a baseline, measurement date, source, and comparison method.
- Unknown or unfinished outcomes are labelled instead of being presented as success.
- Client names, logos, testimonials, and private data are used only with permission.
Frequently asked questions
Is an internal case study the same as a client case study?
No. An internal case study documents work completed on AI Search Ready itself. Client case studies will be labelled separately and published only when the client has approved the facts and any identifying details.
Do these case studies guarantee AI rankings or recommendations?
No. Search engines and AI platforms control their results. A case study can verify work completed and measured outcomes, but it cannot guarantee that another business will receive the same result.
How does AI Search Ready verify a published result?
We separate implementation evidence from performance evidence. Technical claims are checked against the built and live website. Visibility, traffic, lead, or ranking claims are published only when dated measurement supports them.
Published and maintained by AI Search Ready. Last reviewed: September 22, 2026.
Ready to see where your business shows up in AI search?
Book a free introductory AI visibility check to review your business, priority questions, and likely search gaps. It is a high-level starting point, not the full paid audit.